Inline highlighting
Every likely match is marked directly in your text, in context, not just listed separately.
Paste your writing to highlight likely passive-voice constructions inline, with a running list, a count, and the share of sentences affected.
Heuristic only: this tool pattern-matches be-verbs plus participles, it does not perform true grammar analysis. Always review flagged phrases yourself.
Passive voice isn't wrong, but too much of it can bury who's actually doing something in a sentence. Seeing every likely instance highlighted makes it easy to decide, sentence by sentence, whether to keep it or rewrite it.
Every likely match is marked directly in your text, in context, not just listed separately.
The built-in list catches common irregular forms like written, taken and given, not just -ed endings.
This is a heuristic, clearly labeled as such, not a claim of full grammatical analysis.
Passive voice in English is typically formed with a conjugated form of the verb to be, such as am, is, are, was, were, be, being or been, followed by a past participle, as in "the report was written" rather than the active "she wrote the report." This tool looks for exactly that shape: a be-verb followed, within a short word window to allow for adverbs like "was quickly written," by something that looks like a past participle. Regular participles are easy to spot because they end in -ed, but English has roughly 150 to 200 common irregular verbs whose past participles don't follow that pattern, so this tool also checks against a built-in list of about 60 of the most frequently used irregular participles, covering words like written, done, made, seen, taken, given, broken, chosen, known, shown, spoken, driven, eaten, found, held, kept, left, lost, sent, sold, taught, told, thought, understood, won, brought, bought, caught, felt, heard, met, put, said, sat, stood and more. Because this is pattern matching rather than true parsing, it has known blind spots: it can flag a be-verb plus an adjective that merely looks like a participle, such as "the room was crowded," and it can miss a passive construction phrased in an unusual order. Treat every highlight as a prompt to look closer, not as an automatic error.
Passive voice is the right choice when the actor is unknown, unimportant, or deliberately de-emphasized.
Adjectival past participles can trigger a false flag; use your judgment on each highlight.
Use the highlights to review your writing, not as an automatic grammar correction.
It scans for a form of the verb to be, such as is, was, were or been, followed within a few words by a word that looks like a past participle, either ending in -ed or matching a built-in list of about 60 common irregular participles like written, made, taken or given.
No. It is a pattern-matching heuristic, not a grammar parser, so it can miss some genuine passive constructions and occasionally flag a phrase that is not truly passive, such as a be-verb used with an adjective that happens to end in -ed.
Any sentence containing at least one detected be-verb plus past-participle match is counted as passive when calculating the percentage of passive sentences shown in the summary.
Active voice usually names who is doing the action, which tends to make writing more direct and easier to follow, though passive voice is sometimes the better choice, such as when the actor is unknown or unimportant.
Yes. Detection runs entirely in your browser using plain JavaScript. Your text is never uploaded or stored.
More free wellness and writing tools from My Panda Toolbox.